Need Info?  Click98

TODAY'S DATE
 SITE MAP | TERMS of USE |  CUSTOMER COMMENTS | AG INFO | SHOP | TEST RESULTS | EMAIL | PRODUCTS | WARRANTY | HOME | PET ODOR CONTROL | CONTACT INFO 

CORP INFO

LIVESTOCK

WASTE WATER TREATMENT

ALGAE CONTROL

LAWN CARE

GARDENING

AGRICULTURE

OIL SPILL CLEANUP

SEPTIC TANK PRODUCTS

COMPOSTING

   ecochem.com

 

FARM BILL CHANGES COULD HURT ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

CHAMPAIGN, ILLINOIS — One of the most effective voluntary conservation programs is changing for the worst under the proposed 2002 Farm Bill.

The Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) helps local people decide where funding is most needed to address local water quality concerns and provide incentives to farmers to address those concerns. The program’s effectiveness is due in part to its long-term, conservation plan-driven approach that focuses funding on priority watersheds.

But agribusiness groups, like Farm Bureau and Illinois Beef Association, have sought to change the program.

"Agricultural industry groups want to turn an effective conservation program into a enormous taxpayer giveaway for large corporate-style farms," said Marc Miller, Watershed Organizer for Prairie Rivers Network, Illinois’ statewide river conservation group.

Agricultural industry groups want EQIP to give highest priority to large-scale confined animal feeding operations. They also want to increase the annual payment limit five times to $50,000 and program total limit to $200,000 to accommodate the factory farms. Other changes include eliminating the priority areas, based on water quality problems, and include measures that eliminate conservation planning.

"Farm Bureau’s so-called support of conservation actually subsidizes the get-big-or-get-out attitude that has forced many conservation-minded farmers out of agriculture," stated Miller.

Miller pointed out that if EQIP is not restored in the Senate version of the Farm Bill, farmers will lose a voluntary tool to meet agriculture’s responsibility in watershed restoration plans required by the Clean Water Act. Farm Bureau and other industry groups have opposed agriculture’s inclusion in these watershed restoration plans.

One amendment proposed by Senator Wellstone (D-WI) would restrict new or expanding confined animal feedlot operations from receiving cost-share funds for structures, and limit the size of the recipient by the number of animals raised on the farm. Agricultural industry groups are opposing this "Wellstone" amendment.

For more information, contact:
Marc Miller

Watershed Organizer
Prairie Rivers Network
217-344-2371

 

"Serious problems cannot be dealt with at the level of thinking that created them."
 Albert Einstein
Safe Shopping Site

This site is optimized for  
Use of this site indicates that you accept the TERMS OF USE.
Copyright EcoChem - 1998 . 2014 - All Rights Reserved